klip izlearkadaşlıkTuristik Yerlerkomiksilifkeklip izleoyun indir
Heritage Action - The Heritage Journal
Home The Nine Ladies of Stanton Moor, The Peak District
about us
our beliefs
heritage alerts
your heritage
downloads
shop
links

contact us

home / the heritage journal

Welcome to the
Heritage Journal

news and views from Heritage Action

If you would like to contribute something, please email us.


Is a Code for Responsible Collecting too much to ask?
August 22, 2008, 1:02 pm

Heritage Action's chairman has proposed (on the British Archaeology discussion list) that the leading archaeological bodies should follow up their Code for Responsible Detecting with a Code for Responsible Collecting.

Most looting, whether in Britain or abroad, happens because there are thousands of collectors and dealers mostly in rich Western countries (particularly the USA) willing to buy objects without doing all they can to ensure they are licit. This sad reality has long demanded a clear official statement indicating precisely how collectors should act in order to avoid buying stolen goods.

Encouragingly, Dr Mike Heyworth, Director of the Council for British Archaeology, described the suggestion as "valuable" and suggested that Britarch members might put a draft together. Unfortunately the response has been limited. To be sure, a discussion draft was produced by Dr Raimund Karl of Bangor University which (although we would take issue with parts of it) was an honest and constructive attempt. The same could hardly be said of the contributions that have come from the collecting lobby (all from North America, bizarrely).

We are asked to accept that collectors aren't the problem! It is entirely down to unco-operative archaeologists and repressive antiquities laws that work against honest and worthy collectors. In addition, since collectors are blameless they must be compensated for any enforced reduction in the flow of looted items onto the antiquities market: British museums must sell to the trade millions of "redundant" items from their store rooms and selected collectors should be allowed to help British archaeologists dig up British archaeological sites in exchange for keeping the objects found!

Fortunately, such altruistic suggestions (proposed by a leading American coin dealer! ) are unlikely to ever be adopted but nevertheless we have reached a position where the Director of the Council for British Archaeology has acknowledged a code would be useful. So we feel justified in calling upon his organisation together with English Heritage, the Portable Antiquities Scheme and other signatories of the closely related Detecting code to draft and publish a Code for Responsible Collecting.

There will be little dispute (other than from certain collectors, dealers and suppliers) about what such a Code should say. This was recognised many years ago when the intention to deal with the illicit trade was first voiced and Lord Renfrew coined the phrase "collectors are the real looters". Why nothing happened then (or why the requisite provisions on Collecting weren't included in the recent Detecting Code) is a mystery, but in any event action remains urgently needed.

The draftees could do worse than follow the suggestions of Paul McSweeny, a responsible Irish coin collector who recently urged an ethical approach to his colleagues on an American coin collectors list. His proposals comprised commonsensical things like only buying items that could plausibly have come from existing collections, avoiding those which are very clearly recently dug up and not buying from dealers in source countries without sensible antiquities laws.

He was met with deafening silence over there. He need not be over here. Unlike those American collectors, Britain has committed itself under Article 10 of the UNESCO convention to conduct educational outreach to the public on the damage done by the illicit trade. So publishing a Code for Responsible Collecting for the illumination of the public is not too much to ask. It is the least that should be expected.



permalink
Save Nine Maidens Common
August 22, 2008, 12:50 pm

A Guest Report by Alex Langstone

I recently received correspondence from local author Ian Cooke about a scheme proposed by Natural England's HEATH project to fence off parts of the Penwith Moors in West Cornwall in readiness to graze cattle. In imminent danger is Nine Maidens Common. I visited the site today and here is my humble opinion on the sorry saga.

Nine Maidens of Boskednan
The Nine Maidens of Boskednan. Photo credit: Alex Langstone

Nine Maidens Common and other areas of significant archaeological importance are under threat from the Natural England HEATH project. The project has plans to manage the wild moorland of Penwith in West Cornwall. Whilst I have absolutely no objection to the management of the moors (they do need managing, otherwise they will become bracken and gorse thickets! ) I am concerned that by putting up fencing and allowing cattle to graze areas such as the Nine Maidens common will be detrimental to the sensitive nature of the landscape. Cattle cannot eat much bracken, and as bracken is the main problem on the moors, I do not really understand why we need any more grazing than we already have? Land management by bracken clearing is one of the things that the HEATH project are already successfully implementing through education and the need to clear with traditional methods using machinery, hand tools and people.

The Land's End peninsula is world famous for its archaeology and beauty; and whilst it is, and should remain, a working landscape, we need to strike a balance between the needs to the land, the needs of farmers and the needs of tourism. The HEATH project is a well-meant project, and in some areas cattle grazing is a good idea. But, cattle around ancient sites of significant cultural importance can create muddy quagmires on open moorland. Damage to the stones and the fabric of these ancient monuments can be substantial when cattle are allowed to graze amongst them. Erecting fences with points of access through gates will create damage and erosion to the landscape by funnelling people into small areas of entry. Cattle also congregate at these entry points, which can only make the problem worse. Nine maidens common does not need any grazing. I visited the site today, and it is well managed enough already. It is one of the most popular areas of open moorland in Penwith, with access to such famous sites as the Men an Tol, Nine Maidens stone circle, Men Scryfa and Carn Galva. Plus loads of other Bronze Age barrows and standing stones, not well known, but equally important. Other areas such as Mulfra Common and Lanyon are also being considered for grazing. It is important to note that the Nine Maidens Common is a registered common, and as such, needs the permission of the Secretary of State for Environment before any changes can occur.

Most importantly, Nine Maidens Common contains some of the finest and most interesting prehistoric sites in Southern Britain. Boskednan stone circle (marked on OS map as Nine Maidens, pictured above) is partly ruinous, but retains enough to be a dominating presence on the moor. When first viewed from the footpath, it stands out prominently almost on the top of the highest ridge. Eleven stones remain of the original twenty-two, one of which is remarkably tall for the stone circles of the region, standing at 2 metres. Other stones range from 1 to 1.3 metres in height. A slightly later round barrow touches the south side and can be clearly seen. About 40 metres north- north-west of the circle can be seen the remaining stump of an outlying menhir, and further to the north are the remains of three round barrows, one of which still has its large retaining stones, (pictured below) though the earthen mound has long since departed the scene! All in all this is a superb Bronze Age archaeological landscape, which needs to be protected and preserved.

In conclusion land management is vital to the conservation of our moors and heaths, but not by cattle grazing at the more sensitive archaeological sites please!

A dedicated website has been set up by local author Ian Cooke, please visit and sign the petition, write to local MP, Andrew George, write to the Secretary of State for Environment, The Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn MP, and above all, tell people about this. It is vital we all have our viewpoint put forward before it is too late.

www.savepenwithmoors.com

You can also contact the HEATH project and visit their website www.theheathproject.org.uk
Point of contact: Joe Oliver, partnership manager. Email: joe.oliver@naturalengland.org.uk

Or write to: The HEATH Project, Natural England, Pydar House, Pydar Street, Truro, TR1 1XU, tel 01872 245045

Andrew George MP, Trewella, 18 Mayne Rd, Penzance TR18 4NG.

Secretary of State for the Environment. The Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR

The above report by Alex Langstone first appeared on his website, Spirit of Albion on 12 August 2008: it is reprinted here with his kind permission. While we welcome contributions on heritage-related subjects to the Heritage Action Journal, the opinions expressed therein and the accuracy of the reporting lie solely with the originators of the report.



permalink
Restoring Avebury Stone Circle
August 16, 2008, 3:51 pm

A guest article submitted by Ric Kemp.

Avebury is a unique, 5000 year old Neolithic (New Stone Age) 'henge' or ritual circle in North Wiltshire, Southwest Britain. The henge encompasses an unrelated village, which crept inside the circle millennia later. The monument is a colossal arrangement of tall megaliths ['mega'- big; 'lithos'- stone], some weighing over 100 tonnes. Avebury is rightly a wonder of the world, and attracts thousands of visitors each year.

Avebury

However, until the pioneering archaeologist Alexander Keiller began excavation and restoration work, in the 1930s, there was very little to see, apart from quaint houses - built from demolished standing stones, and forlorn megaliths ringed round with fences and shrubbery. Even the circle's impressive banked-ditch (originally 9m deep) was hidden beneath village rubbish, being used as the local refuse tip! Keiller cleared the ditch and re-erected half of the Stone Age site, before his health gave way, and his considerable yet finite funds were exhausted. World War 2 saw the end of Keiller's vision, to restore the whole monument, and he died in 1955. He left his unfinished restoration to the National Trust for posterity.

Historically, Alexander Keiller wasn't the only fan of Avebury. John Aubrey 'discovered' the monument, when he chanced upon its "vast stones" in 1649. A little less than a century later, the antiquarian William Stukeley made a detailed study of the megalithic complex, work which in many ways blazed the trail for the partial restoration 300 years later. Stukeley witnessed the direct results of sustained violence upon Avebury's stones, and importantly recorded megaliths which have since tragically vanished.

In modern times, folks visit and indeed use Avebury as a place of worship. But this awe-inspiring, open air temple remains, as Keiller had to leave it, semi-restored, semi-ruinous. The whole area is now designated a World Heritage Site, which designation frowns upon raising up, fallen and buried standing stones: mute testimony to the ravages of an unsympathetic past.

Avebury

Can we not, enthusiasts and specialists alike, complete the work of restoring Avebury, as a mark of respect to the inspired exertions of Alexander Keiller, and the Avebury People who built an incredible monument 5000 years ago, which we would struggle to equal today with modern technology?

Avebury

The author - a pagan polytheist - seeks to form a loose, informal forum, for the exchange of ideas and experiences, towards once again restoring Avebury. He can be contacted at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avebury_uk_/ and looks forward to hearing from like-minded stone-lovers, with a view to our megalithic heritage and future.

While we welcome reports on heritage-related subjects to the Heritage Action Journal, the opinions expressed therein and the accuracy of the reporting lie solely with the originators of the report.



permalink
Rotherwas Ribbon: the truth that can no longer be hidden
August 5, 2008, 8:49 am

We thought this letter in the Hereford Times was worth highlighting

"IN the past I have criticised the building of Rotherwas Access Road, not least because it destroyed the Rotherwas Ribbon, a unique national treasure.

Now I have actually travelled along it I have changed my mind. It is wonderful.

I thought it was only fair to test it, so I drove along the road at rush hour on the first Friday it was open, expecting to be squeezed between juggernauts and home-going commuters.

Instead I was the only one travelling westerly and only met two motor-bikes and two cars coming the other way. We waved at each other in the sheer joy of driving; it was just like the golden age of motoring.

Thank you Herefordshire Council for building me my own private road."

http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/letters/3212513.Rotherwas_Access_Road___and_faint_praise___/

A Heritage Action member has also driven along the road for several miles and met NO-ONE. It seems that when the government warned - twice - that the road wasn't needed and refused to finance it they were right....

Here's a video - judge for yourself how busy it is!
http://www.herefordtimes.com/video/33900/?archive_page=0

But someone wanted this virtually "private" road for their own "private" reasons it seems - and Hereford Council moved heaven and earth and Truth to oblige them.

Job done, eh boys?... and to hell with the Rotherwas Ribbon!



permalink
Castlerigg (re)visited
August 1, 2008, 4:09 pm

A Heritage Action site inspector visited Castlerigg on Monday to investigate the condition of the ground where turfs were lifted in order to build a fire for part of some ad-hoc "ceremony" a couple of weeks back.

He says: "It was obvious that the ground had been disturbed, as the relatively freshly laid turfs were discoloured - probably dying as the ground beneath them had been scorched by the fire.

Castlerigg, Monday 28th July 2008
The area in the centre of Castlerigg stone circle where the turfs were removed in order to start a fire. Photo credit: Heritage Action

That said, I would imagine that the ground will heal in time, and that no permanent visible damage would have occurred.

Obviously this doesn't excuse any wilful damage caused to an ancient site. It is illegal to damage a protected site. Common sense should tell people that it is WRONG to start a fire in the middle of a monument such as Castlerigg! Who knows what damage could be caused to any unexcavated archaeology?"

Castlerigg, Monday 28th July 2008
Another view of the damaged area of turf in Castlerigg stone circle. Photo credit: Heritage Action

Heritage Action encourage people to adhere to the ASLaN Charter - 'Don't change the site, let the site change you.'

It's really very simple, but a surprising amount of people choose to ignore the guidelines.



permalink
Page :  1 


August 2008
SMTWTFS
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
<< >>


Recent posts


Archives


RSS 2.0